Information for the 2011 nationwide domestic Survey Visible minority adjustable were released on might 8, 2013, included in a built-in launch with other ethnocultural and Aboriginal factors.
To learn more about and usage of 2011 NHS information, please relate to the Census Program internet site.
Information quality
The nationwide Household Survey (NHS) underwent a comprehensive data quality evaluation just like the thing that was done when it comes to 2011 Census of populace and censuses that are past. It contains an evaluation of numerous information quality indicators (such as for instance reaction price), and an assessment associated with results that are overall when compared with other data sources such as for instance census of populace data.
Survey procedure
Quality indicators had been determined and examined at all the key actions associated with the study. Throughout the collection and processing associated with information, the standard and persistence for the reactions supplied were evaluated since were the non-response prices. The quality of the imputed reactions had been examined following the conclusion for the control and imputation actions.
official Certification of last quotes
As soon as data processing and imputation had been finished, the info had been weighted to express the full total Canadian population. These weighted information (the last quotes) had been then certified to find out when they had been coherent and dependable compared to other separate information sources. Here is the stage that is final of validation. The key shows with this evaluation are presented below.
Non-response bias
As an example, based on the quotes and styles from the sources stated earlier, evidence implies that the Filipino populace group is overestimated in the level that is national. The arab population group is suggested to be underestimated in the 2011 NHS on the other hand.
Generally speaking, the possibility of mistake increases for lower quantities of geography as well as smaller populations. The data sources used to evaluate these results are also less reliable making it difficult to certify these smaller counts at the same time.
Information quality indicators
Of all quality indicators utilized for the assessment, two are presented: the international non-response rate and also the imputation price by concern.
| Provinces and territories | Population team (percent) |
|---|---|
| Canada | 3.9 |
| Newfoundland and Labrador | 4.2 |
| Prince Edward Island | 4.2 |
| Nova Scotia | 3.4 |
| New Brunswick | 3.5 |
| Quebec | 3.6 |
| Ontario | 4.2 |
| Manitoba | 3.7 |
| Saskatchewan | 3.5 |
| Alberta | 3.8 |
| Uk Columbia | 3.8 |
| Yukon | 4.4 |
| Northwest Territories | 3.3 |
| Nunavut | 4.9 |
Comparability along with other information sources
The nationwide domestic Survey (NHS) is Statistics Canada’s main way to obtain information on populace team plus the noticeable minority populace. Just before 2011, the Census of Population accumulated information about these ideas. Other household studies ( e.g. , the General Social Survey) additionally gather data regarding the populace team and noticeable minority populace.
Many facets affect evaluations of populace team and minority that is visible information across these sources. Amongst other factors, comparability is afflicted with variations in survey target populations, guide period, sampling and collection practices; concern wording, questionnaire structure, examples and guidelines; methods to information processing; the social and governmental weather at enough time of information collection. For more information, please see the nationwide Household Survey consumer Guide, Catalogue no. 99-001-X.
Is one thing no longer working? Will there be information outdated? Aren’t able to find what you are searching for?
Please call us and write to us exactly exactly how you can be helped by us.
